extremadura meeting?

[Simon Richter]

Hi,

Faidon Liambotis wrote:

>>> Good candidates would be mISDN, if the relevant people would be willing
>>> to attend.

>> Disagree[1].

> I really can't understand your reluctance to work inside the team.

In this case, it's more a matter of not seeing how sitting around a 
common table would improve things, besides the peer pressure that I 
already acknowledged would be a good thing. This is neither a 
communication/coordination issue or a highly parallelizable work.

Essentially, I have 1.1.5-1 mostly ready, except for the "blacklisting 
those modules we do not want" bits, which is going to live in a separate 
package (source package "isdn-alternatives", binary packages 
"isdn-alternatives-misdn" and "isdn-alternatives-zaptel") which the 
module packages just depend on. The module interdependencies are hacked 
so that all the L1-3 modules are pulled in by the hardware drivers, this 
avoids the kernel Oopses, but the module options telling the hardware 
driver which layers to bind to are still needed if you want to run it 
with asterisk.

    Simon