extremadura meeting?
Faidon Liambotis
paravoid at debian.org
Sat Aug 25 03:08:42 UTC 2007
Simon Richter wrote:
>> I really can't understand your reluctance to work inside the team.
>
> In this case, it's more a matter of not seeing how sitting around a
> common table would improve things, besides the peer pressure that I
> already acknowledged would be a good thing. This is neither a
> communication/coordination issue or a highly parallelizable work.
>
> Essentially, I have 1.1.5-1 mostly ready, except for the "blacklisting
> those modules we do not want" bits, which is going to live in a separate
> package (source package "isdn-alternatives", binary packages
> "isdn-alternatives-misdn" and "isdn-alternatives-zaptel") which the
> module packages just depend on. The module interdependencies are hacked
> so that all the L1-3 modules are pulled in by the hardware drivers, this
> avoids the kernel Oopses, but the module options telling the hardware
> driver which layers to bind to are still needed if you want to run it
> with asterisk.
As I said to you on IRC, I'd prefer for you to make these changes (both
1.1.5-1 and isdn-alternatives) in our SVN repository.
So, I guess my problem is that I can't see how we can improve things if
you don't give us a chance to improve them.
You are a member of the VoIP team, these are certainly VoIP packages,
their primary users are packages that the VoIP team maintains, others
have expressed interest in working on them (and even add them to the
repository!) and yet you refuse to work collaboratively on them.
Yet you do want to collaborate with the team on other packages and even
come to our meeting.
I really do not understand your behavior.
Regards,
Faidon
More information about the Pkg-voip-maintainers
mailing list