transition: proposal libpt2.6.5->libpt2.6.6 & libopal3.6.6->libopal3.6.7

[Adam D. Barratt]

On Wed, 2010-05-05 at 09:58 +0200, Eugen Dedu wrote:
> On 05/05/10 00:14, Mark Purcell wrote:
> > On Saturday 24 April 2010 16:53:33 Eugen Dedu wrote:
> >> I have asked upstream (Robert Jongbloed) to make a new release ptlib
> >> 2.6.7 and opal 3.6.8 with a very important network fix.  As there is
> >> about stable branches, there should be no regression, we will check it
> >> anyway.  Could we wait for a week?
> >
> > Eugen,
> >
> > Any word on this upstream release?
> 
> I have sent a second e-mail upstream...

Has there been any response yet?

> > Can we backport the fix to ptlib2.6.6?
> 
> I still propose a last chance for that: if in one week nothing happens, 
> I do the backport right afterwards.

So far as I can see, we're getting close to that week being up.

> > debian-release.  Any direction on this transition proposal?

Sorry for not getting back to you sooner.  This transition looks
self-contained enough that we should be able to start it without
interfering with other transitions.

Do we know whether this will fix the opal FTBFS on hppa (#572384)?  If
it doesn't then the transition will get stuck in unstable.

Regards,

Adam