Bug#846758: Supporting H.323 Stack in Stretch?

Joerg Dorchain joerg at dorchain.net
Thu Jan 19 13:03:50 UTC 2017


On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 12:56:23PM +0100, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
> 
> I have just come across
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=766045 whichs says
> that
> 
> a) there is a fork at  https://github.com/PeteDavidson/t38modem
> b) t38modem (I guess only the old version) won't work with current opal
> http://sourceforge.net/p/opalvoip/mailman/message/32955378/ . 
> 
> I guess since it is too late for Stretch now and we will likely have to
> upgrade opal sooner or later I think the only way forward will be the
> fork.

After stretch, defintivly yes.
> 
> Would you be willing to maintain this? I haven't received or sent a fax
> in 5+ years, I cannot test this.

Well, I could give it a try.

However, I received ~5 faxes last year and sent 1, so I am not
the most active fax user ever. Besides, with more bandwidth and
less jitter, faxes even work with plain iaxmodem[0]

Nevertheless, when there is a newer opal version in debian and
t38modem then has a nother FTBS-bugs, I can proabably package the
version from github.

Bye,

Joerg

[0] An analog paper scanned, converted to sound signals, then
digitised again, send in small packet over the net, all by the
same CPU in realtime. Receiving end analog. Amazing[1]..
[1] Most people just send pdfs directly.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 898 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-voip-maintainers/attachments/20170119/c5521557/attachment-0002.sig>


More information about the Pkg-voip-maintainers mailing list