Bug#946412: janus-gateway: upstream does not support stable releases

Salvatore Bonaccorso carnil at debian.org
Fri Jun 12 19:56:01 BST 2020


Hi Jonas,

On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 08:53:35AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Quoting Salvatore Bonaccorso (2020-06-11 22:54:43)
> > On Sun, Dec 08, 2019 at 02:09:10PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > > Upstream releases are to be considered draft snapshots,
> > > and this package is therefore unsuitable for inclusion
> > > in long-term distributions like Debian stable.
> > > 
> > > This bug should be bumped to release-critical state
> > > close to or after entering freeze -
> > > but not before so as to ease use for users tracking testing
> > > including derivatives based on Debian testing.
> > 
> > Reading the above, so janus should not have been in buster, right?
> 
> While in good faith, I am not sure what you are implying with the above: 
> In an ideal World (where crystal balls or time machines exist), yes.
> 
> Both filing this bugreport and the upstream statement triggering it 
> occured _after_ the release of Buster, indicating lack of knowledge on 
> the matter at the time of release of Buster (or, in bad faith, that it 
> was known but kept secret - sure you cannot mean that).

Sorry I think there was a missunderstanding here, I by no means
implied bad faith or that at the time of the buster release it was
known. I probably wrote the above too short to make it clear. Let me
expand a bit.

While I was filling bug for the new CVEs reported for janus I stumpled
over #946412 and that made me think to reply there and raise the
question on the removal of janus from buster. What I actually wanted
to ask with the above is "should janus be removed from buster as
ideally it would not have been released with it" but not implying the
situation was already clear at that time.

Sorry if that all was not clear in my wording.

Thanks for filling the removal, taken note of #962694.

Regards,
Salvatore



More information about the Pkg-voip-maintainers mailing list