Bug#946412: janus-gateway: upstream does not support stable releases
Jonas Smedegaard
dr at jones.dk
Fri Jun 12 20:10:56 BST 2020
Quoting Salvatore Bonaccorso (2020-06-12 20:56:01)
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 08:53:35AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > Quoting Salvatore Bonaccorso (2020-06-11 22:54:43)
> > > On Sun, Dec 08, 2019 at 02:09:10PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > > > Upstream releases are to be considered draft snapshots,
> > > > and this package is therefore unsuitable for inclusion
> > > > in long-term distributions like Debian stable.
> > > >
> > > > This bug should be bumped to release-critical state
> > > > close to or after entering freeze -
> > > > but not before so as to ease use for users tracking testing
> > > > including derivatives based on Debian testing.
> > >
> > > Reading the above, so janus should not have been in buster, right?
> >
> > While in good faith, I am not sure what you are implying with the
> > above: In an ideal World (where crystal balls or time machines
> > exist), yes.
> >
> > Both filing this bugreport and the upstream statement triggering it
> > occured _after_ the release of Buster, indicating lack of knowledge
> > on the matter at the time of release of Buster (or, in bad faith,
> > that it was known but kept secret - sure you cannot mean that).
>
> Sorry I think there was a missunderstanding here, I by no means
> implied bad faith or that at the time of the buster release it was
> known. I probably wrote the above too short to make it clear. Let me
> expand a bit.
>
> While I was filling bug for the new CVEs reported for janus I stumpled
> over #946412 and that made me think to reply there and raise the
> question on the removal of janus from buster. What I actually wanted
> to ask with the above is "should janus be removed from buster as
> ideally it would not have been released with it" but not implying the
> situation was already clear at that time.
>
> Sorry if that all was not clear in my wording.
>
> Thanks for filling the removal, taken note of #962694.
Thanks for clarifying. All makes sense.
I realize that our conversation could've been even smoother if I had
just _silently_ assumed good faith, instead of nitpicking. Sorry for
that, I've learned from this.
- Jonas
--
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
[x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: signature
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-voip-maintainers/attachments/20200612/40dbfab4/attachment.sig>
More information about the Pkg-voip-maintainers
mailing list