Bug#830889: Looks like my patch violates RFC3501

Nye Liu nyet at nyet.org
Tue Jul 19 22:10:53 UTC 2016

On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 10:34:18AM -0400, Doug Torrance wrote:
> I was wondering if you had any updates about this bug.
> Is violating RFC3501 a dealbreaker?  Should wmbiff use search, or should we
> go ahead and release a version with your original patch to fix the bug?

Naw, I don't think using status breaks anything, as long as we make sure the
mailbox is closed before we call status on it.

Attached is my latest patch.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: EXAMINE-before-STATUS.diff
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 976 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-wmaker-devel/attachments/20160719/d842cebd/attachment.diff>

More information about the Pkg-wmaker-devel mailing list