Bug#830889: Looks like my patch violates RFC3501

[Doug Torrance]

Control: tags -1 pending

On 07/19/2016 06:10 PM, Nye Liu wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 10:34:18AM -0400, Doug Torrance wrote:
>> I was wondering if you had any updates about this bug.
>>
>> Is violating RFC3501 a dealbreaker?  Should wmbiff use search, or should we
>> go ahead and release a version with your original patch to fix the bug?
>
> Naw, I don't think using status breaks anything, as long as we make sure the
> mailbox is closed before we call status on it.
>
> Attached is my latest patch.

Thanks!

I've just requested sponsorship for a new version of the package 
incorporating your patch.

Doug