[Pkg-xen-devel] Pending upload
Ralph Passgang
ralph at debianbase.de
Sun Feb 26 01:40:38 UTC 2006
Am Sonntag, 26. Februar 2006 00:26 schrieb Julien Danjou:
> On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 08:07:22PM +0100, Guido Trotter wrote:
> Hello,
>
> > One last thought... We haven't heard anything back from Bastian (for
> > which I'm sorry, I would really have liked if he had joined us) and in
> > the meantime consensus seem to have formed on -kernel and -devel, or at
> > least there was no more answers... Which means at least people don't
> > disagree strongly with the conclusions taken...
>
> It seems, it seems.
>
> > In the meantime, though, there's still the upload of xen 3 pending in
> > NEW... What about it? Are the ftpmasters going to reject it automatically
> > because they read the ML?
>
> Is there care bears in your world? ;-)
>
> > Are they going to approve it and then we'll have to see what's
> > inside and have upgrade paths from that other than Adam's, should we tell
> > them something, either privately, or filing a bug on them! (well, on
> > ftp.debian.org)
>
> We should try to mail them to ask that they don't accept it.
> If it fails, we should simply upload a 3.0.1xenteam-1 version I think or
> something like that :-(
Yeah, we should ask to reject the packages and why (at least a link to the
discussion on the devel list).
It would be ugly if Bastian has changed a lot from 2.0.6 and we would have to
support a clean upgrade from 2.0.6 (or 2.0.7 inofficial packages) + from
bastian 3.0.x package. It would also only make the "disgreement" public that
seems to be existing between bastians plans and more or less the rest of the
people that discussed about xen on the debian-devel list.
We should mail the ftp-masters + cc to debian-devel, pkg-xen-devel, bastian &
adam and tell publicy that we want to provide xen packages (for userspace and
hypervisor) and that there seems to be a consense for that and that we would
like for that reason that bastian packages gets rejected + that we would like
again that bastian + adam to join our efforts.
That would make clear that we want to "takeover" but with the possibility that
everybody that wants to contribute can join us easily. And it would inform
everybody about our plans, so not someone else tries to have our packages
rejected too.
argh, I am wondering a bit... at first it seems to me that there is no
interessting for xen3 in debian and I made my own packages and now there are
soooo many people interessted in xen3 and starting a fight about who will
take over adams work... is debian always so "political"? :)
--Ralph
More information about the Pkg-xen-devel
mailing list