[Python-modules-team] python-yaml: can it be priority optional?

[Scott Kitterman]

On Monday 23 March 2009 13:33, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 06:24:43AM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > It's extra because (and only because) it depends on libyaml whic is
> > extra.  If you get libyaml moved to optional, I've no problem moving
> > pyyaml back to optional.
>
> I've been in touch with Anders Kaseorg, libyaml's maintainer, and his
> next release is going to put it into optional. So, if you don't mind
> doing the same, that makes the whole tree nice and consistent.
>
That's no problem at all.  It was optional before it depended on libyaml and I 
see no reason for it not to be again.

Scott K