[Python-modules-team] Bug#753785: Bug#753785: flask-silk: please ship icons in a new package which does not depends on python

Sebastian Ramacher sramacher at debian.org
Thu Jul 17 22:00:16 UTC 2014


On 2014-07-14 14:35:30, Dustin Kirkland wrote:
> >    As I read CC-BY-3.0 it is enough to mention to license or add a link back to
> >    it. Since this is done in d/copyright, there is no need to patch a copy of
> >    CC-BY-3.0 in. If the FTP masters want a copy of (or a link to) the license,
> >    we would need to repack the orig tarball anyway to include it there.
> 
> Okay.  Any changes required by me, then?

I think it's fine as it is. If it's not enough for FTP masters, we'll
deal with it once we know what they don't like.

> >  * I think there is no point in installing readme.txt as it contains no
> >    additional information. For readme.html to be useful, the image links need to
> >    be patched. After this has been fixed, registering readme.html with doc-base
> >    would be nice.
> 
> Hmm, so I did that, created the patch, and it's over 1000 lines,
> touching basically every <img src...> in that file.
> 
> So, instead, I just created a single symlink in debian/links, that
> puts the icons dir in the doc location, so that those relative links
> work.  This is a lot simpler and cleaner, in my opinion, than creating
> a thousand line patch against the upstream readme.html.

Yes, that's better than patching. :)

> As for registering with doc-base, does dh not just handle that for us
> already, since readme.html is in debian/docs?

Unfortunately no. Listing a file in debian/docs only causes it to get
installed in /usr/share/doc/$package. To register documentation with
doc-base a debian/$package.doc-base is required. It could look something
like this:

Document: famfamfam-silk
Title: FamFamFam "Silk" icon set
Section: Graphics

Format: HTML
Index: /usr/share/doc/famfamfam-silk/readme.html
Files: /usr/share/doc/famfamfam-silk/readme.html

> Updated sources at: http://www.dustinkirkland.com/debian/famfamfam-silk

Looks good. One last thing: please change Priority to optional since the
packages that will depend on it are already optional.

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/python-modules-team/attachments/20140718/58e31bfa/attachment-0001.sig>


More information about the Python-modules-team mailing list