[Python-modules-team] Bug#753785: Bug#753785: flask-silk: please ship icons in a new package which does not depends on python
kirkland at ubuntu.com
Thu Jul 24 15:18:41 UTC 2014
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 3:00 PM, Sebastian Ramacher
<sramacher at debian.org> wrote:
> On 2014-07-14 14:35:30, Dustin Kirkland wrote:
>> > As I read CC-BY-3.0 it is enough to mention to license or add a link back to
>> > it. Since this is done in d/copyright, there is no need to patch a copy of
>> > CC-BY-3.0 in. If the FTP masters want a copy of (or a link to) the license,
>> > we would need to repack the orig tarball anyway to include it there.
>> Okay. Any changes required by me, then?
> I think it's fine as it is. If it's not enough for FTP masters, we'll
> deal with it once we know what they don't like.
>> > * I think there is no point in installing readme.txt as it contains no
>> > additional information. For readme.html to be useful, the image links need to
>> > be patched. After this has been fixed, registering readme.html with doc-base
>> > would be nice.
>> Hmm, so I did that, created the patch, and it's over 1000 lines,
>> touching basically every <img src...> in that file.
>> So, instead, I just created a single symlink in debian/links, that
>> puts the icons dir in the doc location, so that those relative links
>> work. This is a lot simpler and cleaner, in my opinion, than creating
>> a thousand line patch against the upstream readme.html.
> Yes, that's better than patching. :)
>> As for registering with doc-base, does dh not just handle that for us
>> already, since readme.html is in debian/docs?
> Unfortunately no. Listing a file in debian/docs only causes it to get
> installed in /usr/share/doc/$package. To register documentation with
> doc-base a debian/$package.doc-base is required. It could look something
> like this:
> Document: famfamfam-silk
> Title: FamFamFam "Silk" icon set
> Section: Graphics
> Format: HTML
> Index: /usr/share/doc/famfamfam-silk/readme.html
> Files: /usr/share/doc/famfamfam-silk/readme.html
>> Updated sources at: http://www.dustinkirkland.com/debian/famfamfam-silk
> Looks good. One last thing: please change Priority to optional since the
> packages that will depend on it are already optional.
Updated sources at: http://www.dustinkirkland.com/debian/famfamfam-silk
More information about the Python-modules-team