[Python-modules-team] Fwd: Django 1.8 transition

[Luke Faraone]

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Luke Faraone <lfaraone at debian.org>
Date: 23 August 2015 at 18:28
Subject: Django 1.8 transition
To: "python-django at packages.debian.org" <python-django at packages.debian.org>
Cc: Barry Warsaw <barry at debian.org>, Raphaël Hertzog <hertzog at debian.org>


Hi folks,

I did a test rebuild of packages that depend on python-django under 1.7
(unstable)[1] and 1.8 (experimental)[2]. I filed bugs against the
packages that FTBFS under the current version in unstable if there was
not one opened already.

Obviously a package build is not a full test, but it at least catches
the most obvious breakages.

12 dependant packages are already broken under 1.7; 14 more packages
will break under 1.8.[3]

For 1.7, Raphael did a MBF on all reverse-dependencies. Do we want to do
that again, or only for the ones where there was breakage?

  -- Luke Faraone

[1]: https://people.debian.org/~lfaraone/notes/2015-django18/logs/1.7/
[2]: https://people.debian.org/~lfaraone/notes/2015-django18/logs/1.8/
[3]:
https://people.debian.org/~lfaraone/notes/2015-django18/bad_packages-1.8.txt



-- 

Luke Faraone;; Debian & Ubuntu Developer; Sugar Labs; MIT SIPB
lfaraone on irc.[freenode,oftc].net -- https://luke.wf/ohhello
PGP fprint: 5189 2A7D 16D0 49BB 046B  DC77 9732 5DD8 F9FD D506
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/python-modules-team/attachments/20150827/ca4fc0b0/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/python-modules-team/attachments/20150827/ca4fc0b0/attachment.sig>