[Python-modules-team] Bug#944913: Bug#944913: Bug#944913: python3-sphinx: Please update to Sphinx 2.2.1

[Lucas Nussbaum]

On 27/03/20 at 12:10 +0300, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> Hi Lucas!
> 
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 07:26:41AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > So I did the rebuild. I did not rebuild packages that are not in testing
> > (I usually don't rebuild them because there's so much brokenness among
> > them).
> >
> > The logs for builds that succeeded with an unstable chroot, but failed
> > with unstable + sphinx from experimental, are available at
> > http://qa-logs.debian.net/2020/03/26/
> >
> > I've also added http://qa-logs.debian.net/2020/03/26/00summary.txt
> > that summarizes the failures.
> 
> Thanks a lot again. This is just 74 broken packages, which is less than I
> expected.
> 
> > I can do the bug filing, but would need a template similar to
> > https://salsa.debian.org/lucas/collab-qa-tools/-/blob/master/lib/collab-qa/log-parser.rb#L644
> > with probably a paragraph of explanation about the custom sphinx
> > version, when you plan to upload to unstable, etc.
> 
> As you have that process automated, please file bugs. I have attached a
> template.
> 
> Not all summaries are correct, for example "pyversions: Command not found"
> is just a warning, and the real error is different. I guess it's not easy
> to fix, so maybe you can file bugs as is, and I will retitle some of them
> later.

Right, I think I fixed all the cases where the summary was wrong

All bugs filed!

Lucas
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/python-modules-team/attachments/20200327/197ffd2e/attachment.sig>