[Python-modules-team] Bug#944913: Bug#944913: Bug#944913: python3-sphinx: Please update to Sphinx 2.2.1

[Dmitry Shachnev]

Hi Lucas!

On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 07:26:41AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Hi,
>
> So I did the rebuild. I did not rebuild packages that are not in testing
> (I usually don't rebuild them because there's so much brokenness among
> them).
>
> The logs for builds that succeeded with an unstable chroot, but failed
> with unstable + sphinx from experimental, are available at
> http://qa-logs.debian.net/2020/03/26/
>
> I've also added http://qa-logs.debian.net/2020/03/26/00summary.txt
> that summarizes the failures.

Thanks a lot again. This is just 74 broken packages, which is less than I
expected.

> I can do the bug filing, but would need a template similar to
> https://salsa.debian.org/lucas/collab-qa-tools/-/blob/master/lib/collab-qa/log-parser.rb#L644
> with probably a paragraph of explanation about the custom sphinx
> version, when you plan to upload to unstable, etc.

As you have that process automated, please file bugs. I have attached a
template.

Not all summaries are correct, for example "pyversions: Command not found"
is just a warning, and the real error is different. I guess it's not easy
to fix, so maybe you can file bugs as is, and I will retitle some of them
later.

--
Dmitry Shachnev
-------------- next part --------------
From: #{fullname} <#{email}>
To: submit at bugs.debian.org
Subject: #{@package}: FTBFS with Sphinx 2.4: #{@sum_1l}

Source: #{@package}
Version: #{@version}
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-team at lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx2.4

Hi,

#{@package} fails to build with Sphinx 2.4, currently available in
experimental.

Relevant part (hopefully):
> #{@extract.join("\n> ")}

The full build log is available from:
   http://qa-logs.debian.net/#{date}/#{filename}

Please see [1] for Sphinx changelog, which may give a hint of what changes in
Sphinx caused this error.

Also see [2] for the list of deprecated/removed APIs and possible alternatives
to them.

We are going to upload Sphinx 2.4 to unstable in a couple of weeks. When that
happens, we will bump the severity to serious.

In case you have questions, please Cc sphinx at packages.debian.org on reply.

[1]: https://www.sphinx-doc.org/en/2.0/changes.html
[2]: https://www.sphinx-doc.org/en/2.0/extdev/deprecated.html#dev-deprecated-apis

#{bfooter}
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/python-modules-team/attachments/20200327/317d06c0/attachment.sig>