[R-pkg-team] r-cran-googlesheets4_1.0.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

[Andreas Tille]

Hi Thorsten,

OK, I've re-uploaded to new with a hopefully proper fix.

Thanks for thorough checking

    Andreas.

Am Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 07:29:29PM +0200 schrieb Thorsten Alteholz:
> Hi Andreas,
> 
> 
> On 19.10.21 19:46, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > do you have an idea which package contains roxygen2, which is used to create googlesheets4-package.Rd?
> > The term "package" in CRAN terminology is usually what we have as a r-cran-CRANPACKAGE so this
> > is r-cran-roxygen2.
> 
> aaah, ok , I did find this.
> 
> > 
> > > Anyway, upstream has different ideas about the copyright holder in googlesheets4-package.Rd and LICENSE.
> > > There seems to be room for improvement.
> > On what string is your statement based?  The copyright holder of the
> > automatically generated file should be the same as the source, shouldn't
> > it.
> 
> Yes, it is not the copyright of that file but its contents.
> 
>  googlesheets4-package.Rd  says: "\item RStudio [copyright holder, funder]"
>  LICENSE says:  COPYRIGHT HOLDER: Jennifer Bryan and RStudio
> 
> So I would say that Jennifer Bryan is paid by RStudio for the work on
> r-cran-googlesheets4, but RStudio is the only copyright holder.
> 
> > For the moment I've added a separate
> > 
> >     Files: man/googlesheets4-package.Rd
> > 
> > paragraph even if I do not see any actual reason for it.
> 
> Neither do I, sorry.
> 
>    Thorsten
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> R-pkg-team mailing list
> R-pkg-team at alioth-lists.debian.net
> https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r-pkg-team

-- 
http://fam-tille.de