[R-pkg-team] r-cran-venndiagram_1.6.20-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Andreas Tille andreas at an3as.eu
Tue Jan 15 16:35:26 GMT 2019


Hi Thorsten,

On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 04:49:53PM +0100, Steffen Möller wrote:
> Hi Thorsten,
> 
> Have many thanks for your swift review. I saw that inconsistency in the
> files and thought like ... damn ... this will likely be rejected. In my
> opinion, the maintainer expressed that choice of his in the description. I
> don't want to ask, I must admit, don't have the mental energy and don't
> really stand behind the need to clarify the situation. There was freedom to
> choose a license. That freedom was used. If this now means that that R
> package does not enter the distribution, at least not via my hands, then so
> be it.

I agree with Steffen.  The files say:

   GPL (either version 1, or at your option, any later version)
   or "something else"

which is no conflict to GPL-2.

Do we really need to contact upstream about this since as far as I
understood CRAN the License mentioned in DESCRIPTION is the valid
license statement.

Kind regards

      Andreas.

> On 15.01.19 16:00, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
> > HI Steffen,
> > 
> > while DESCRIPTION says GPL-2, the file headers say Perl (=GPL-1+ or Artistic-1).
> > Can you please clarify with upstream what he wants?
> > 
> > Thanks!
> >   Thorsten
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ===
> > 
> > Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
> > your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
> > concerns.
> > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> R-pkg-team mailing list
> R-pkg-team at alioth-lists.debian.net
> https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r-pkg-team

-- 
http://fam-tille.de



More information about the R-pkg-team mailing list