[Reproducible-builds] [Debian Wiki] Update of "ReproducibleBuilds/TimestampsInDocumentationGeneratedByAsciidoc" by jumapico

[Holger Levsen]

Hi,

(mostly a general comment, not so much about this issue.)

On Donnerstag, 9. April 2015, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> A bug _with patch_
> (Usually) bugs with patches are welcome, bugs without might be considered
> annoying.

while I agree in general, I don't think bugs without patches are annoying. I 
still consider them to be very useful and much welcome.

and yes, sure, a bug with patch is a lot better ;-) But I'm quite an enemy of 
perfect, if perfect is an enemy of good ;-)

and yes, i'm totally super happy that our standard is "bugs with patches" but 
if people start with bugs only, that's cool too. (lowering the entry bar and 
all that.)


cheers,
	Holger
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 828 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/reproducible-builds/attachments/20150409/a51b59be/attachment.sig>