[Reproducible-builds] Bug#787444: Bug#787444: help2man: support externally-supplied --date for reproducibility
Daniel Kahn Gillmor
dkg at fifthhorseman.net
Fri Jun 5 16:49:34 UTC 2015
On Fri 2015-06-05 10:55:34 -0400, Brendan O'Dea wrote:
> Any of UTC_SOURCE_DATE, SOURCE_DATE_UTC
My vote is for SOURCE_DATE_UTC, and i agree with Brendan that we should
take the opportunity to define this as strictly and narrowly as possible
(i.e. end in a 'Z', none of the other offsets), so that people relying
on it know they're getting a fixed thing, and don't have to implement
any fancy parsing/offsetting code if they're not already using an
ISO8601-compliant date-parsing library.
> REPRODUCABLE_BUILD_SOURCE_DATE_UTC would work for me
I don't like this one, because apparently it's too hard to spell :)
--dkg
More information about the Reproducible-builds
mailing list