[Reproducible-builds] Bug#787444: Bug#787444: help2man: support externally-supplied --date for reproducibility

Daniel Kahn Gillmor dkg at fifthhorseman.net
Fri Jun 5 16:49:34 UTC 2015


On Fri 2015-06-05 10:55:34 -0400, Brendan O'Dea wrote:
> Any of UTC_SOURCE_DATE, SOURCE_DATE_UTC

My vote is for SOURCE_DATE_UTC, and i agree with Brendan that we should
take the opportunity to define this as strictly and narrowly as possible
(i.e. end in a 'Z', none of the other offsets), so that people relying
on it know they're getting a fixed thing, and don't have to implement
any fancy parsing/offsetting code if they're not already using an
ISO8601-compliant date-parsing library.

> REPRODUCABLE_BUILD_SOURCE_DATE_UTC would work for me

I don't like this one, because apparently it's too hard to spell :)

  --dkg



More information about the Reproducible-builds mailing list