[Reproducible-builds] Bug#787444: Bug#787444: help2man: support externally-supplied --date for reproducibility

Holger Levsen holger at layer-acht.org
Sat Jun 6 14:39:41 UTC 2015


Hi,

On Freitag, 5. Juni 2015, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> My vote is for SOURCE_DATE_UTC, and i agree with Brendan that we should
> take the opportunity to define this as strictly and narrowly as possible
> (i.e. end in a 'Z', none of the other offsets), so that people relying
> on it know they're getting a fixed thing, and don't have to implement
> any fancy parsing/offsetting code if they're not already using an
> ISO8601-compliant date-parsing library.

sounds good to me too!


thanks & cheers,
	Holger
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 828 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/reproducible-builds/attachments/20150606/7abd35b5/attachment.sig>


More information about the Reproducible-builds mailing list