[Reproducible-builds] dropping texlive from our archive
mattia at debian.org
Tue May 31 21:52:43 UTC 2016
I'd like to take a deeper stab at texlive.
The current status is: nearly everything was merged, but one patch.
That patch is basically what makes \today reproducible follow S_D_E
always instead of when somebody enables it with Yet Another Env Var.
As HW42 pointed out on IRC what's left to us is:
1) convice upstream
2) convince Debian maintainer
3) manualy fix packages
4) export a tex specific variable in debhelper
In my opinion:
1+2 were already tried, with very poor results, with both upstream and
debian maintainer not interested at all at even listening to us.
We could still try again though.
4 is a very very ugly thing which would set a very bad precendent for
3 is instead a reasonable choice: according to my codesearch.d.n lookup
there are 149 packages¹ with '\today' somewhere in their code.
I expect that way less than half of them are actually going to effect
output, but I'm going to put my idea of worst case here to half: 75
packages. It would still be a reasonable enough number of packages to
I think that before going to make a choice on it (even if that choice is
"prod upstream some more") we should try to move aside the patched
texlive-bin package from our archive and see how many packages are
actually affected by this.
¹ the list of the resulting packages are attached to this email, would
be nice if somebody could check it against reproducible.json (thing that
I'd do before dropping texlive-bin to be able to compare the results).
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the Reproducible-builds