Bug#925051: diffoscope: FTBFS in stretch (failing tests)

[Chris Lamb]

Hi Santiago,
 
> The relevant thing, IMO, is that proposed-updates and point
> releases still exist for stretch, so I don't see it overkill

Sure. Can you still loop the SRMs in on this before I backport this
patch and create a stretchpu bug, etc. etc.? Thanks. :)

> I don't see how the release cycle of buster is related.

(Only in that one's efforts and energies might be best-placed
directed towards buster, rather than stretch.)


Best wishes,

-- 
      ,''`.
     : :'  :     Chris Lamb
     `. `'`      lamby at debian.org 🍥 chris-lamb.co.uk
       `-