Bug#925051: diffoscope: FTBFS in stretch (failing tests)

[Mattia Rizzolo]

Hi,

On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 04:13:46PM -0400, Chris Lamb wrote:
> > The relevant thing, IMO, is that proposed-updates and point
> > releases still exist for stretch, so I don't see it overkill
> 
> Sure. Can you still loop the SRMs in on this before I backport this
> patch and create a stretchpu bug, etc. etc.? Thanks. :)

That kind of things are done by the person doing the update, and from my
experience the release team doesn't really deal nicely with requests
without a working diff, etc.

I will take this on, directly uploading to stretch as I am confident
they will approve it directly.


tbh I totally forgot about stretch itself while fixing that bug…

-- 
regards,
                        Mattia Rizzolo

GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18  4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540      .''`.
more about me:  https://mapreri.org                             : :'  :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri                  `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia  `-
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/reproducible-builds/attachments/20190320/428aec8f/attachment.sig>