need help making src:fuzzylite reproducible

[Johannes Schauer]

Hi,

Quoting Johannes Schauer (2020-10-25 07:55:30)
> Long story: My package src:fuzzylite used to FTBFS with
> reproducible=+fixfilepath (see #972303). I fixed this by patching out the use
> of __FILE__:
> 
> https://salsa.debian.org/debian/fuzzylite/-/commit/64b73953e5a0a1bf5447e4ba658c18141c105be8
> 
> Now the package builds fine with reproducible=+fixfilepath as evident my my
> following commit to debian/rules:
> 
> https://salsa.debian.org/debian/fuzzylite/-/commit/66ec208234a4cd73d807697c7c16d752ace042c2
> 
> Unfortunately, the reprotest job of my salsa CI pipeline still fails:
> 
> https://salsa.debian.org/debian/fuzzylite/-/pipelines/189461
> 
> I do not understand why. You can also use above link to download the artifacts
> and investigate yourself. The html output of diffoscope is in the first link
> above. The only odd thing that I can see is this extra string '\k#pk'. I do not
> know where that comes from and why it's only part of one build and not the
> other.

I now uploaded the new Debian revision despite the unreproducibility problem
above. The package has now been processed by reproducible.debian.net:

https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/diffoscope-results/fuzzylite.html

Looking at the diff, I don't understand where the differences come from.

Can anybody help?

Thanks!

cheers, josch
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: signature
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/reproducible-builds/attachments/20201028/0d5624c4/attachment.sig>