hope help reproducible-build to support Debian riscv64 arch

[Paul Wise]

On Thu, 2022-06-09 at 11:00 +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:

> For some unknown reason, I thought that riscv64 *was* an official
> Debian architecture, and the tone of my previous emails should be
> read with that (incorrect) assumption in mind.

riscv64 is in the process of becoming an official port and then 
hopefully a released port for bookworm, but isn't quite there yet, the
folks who are involved are looking at the remaining steps from the new
port docs. Repro-builds is in the official port section, after the step
of converting from unofficial to official and before the step of
applying to become a released port. Since repro builds doesn't test
unofficial ports and is a blocker for testing migration, I think this
is the right section of the new port docs, feel free to adjust the
advice if you disagree. Probably this thread was started prematurely
due to the enthusiasm of the port advocates for making the port
available in bookworm and are perhaps looking a few steps too far ahead
in the steps of the process.

https://wiki.debian.org/PortsDocs/New#Unofficial_port
https://wiki.debian.org/PortsDocs/New#Official_port
https://wiki.debian.org/PortsDocs/New#Released_port

-- 
bye,
pabs

https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/reproducible-builds/attachments/20220609/5ccecac6/attachment.sig>