[sane-devel] Bad Performance uhci (vs. usb-ohci ,ohci)
Gunther Mayer
Gunther.Mayer at t-online.de
Sun Feb 10 10:10:07 GMT 2002
Hi,
the "uhci" module suffers from very bad performance (linux-2.4.17).
Scanning 150dpi A4 (merlin670 for Canon N670U over libusb-0.1.4) gives:
uhci: 135 sec.
usb-uhci: 43 sec.
ohci: 35 sec
This corresponds to about 50K/sec for 'uhci' (and the scanner must stop'n'start) !
Is this a known bug in "uhci" ?
Are there plans to resolve the situation to have 2 modules,
probably each with it's own bugs?
First, it would help to have a list with user-visible differences.
Regards, Gunther
More information about the sane-devel
mailing list