[sane-devel] Bad Performance uhci (vs. usb-ohci ,ohci)
Bertrik Sikken
bertrik at zonnet.nl
Sun Feb 10 11:38:11 GMT 2002
Hi,
Gunther Mayer wrote:
> the "uhci" module suffers from very bad performance (linux-2.4.17).
>
> Scanning 150dpi A4 (merlin670 for Canon N670U over libusb-0.1.4) gives:
> uhci: 135 sec.
> usb-uhci: 43 sec.
> ohci: 35 sec
>
> This corresponds to about 50K/sec for 'uhci' (and the scanner must stop'n'start) !
>
> Is this a known bug in "uhci" ?
I found something similar, with transfer rates below 100 kB/s
while it was something like 700 kB/s before, resulting in
heavy backtracking of the scanner head of my HP3300 scanner.
I too used (a custom compiled) kernel 2.4.17, libusb 0.1.4 and
uhci (compiled as module). Using the usb-uhci module instead of
the uhci module solved it for me. I did not further research the
issue, so I can't really tell for sure what caused the problem.
Regards,
Bertrik Sikken
More information about the sane-devel
mailing list