[sane-devel] Re: strange problems LIDE30
Chris McKeever <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Wed, 6 Oct 2004 18:10:12 -0500
well - did some more testing - downgraded the RH 7.3 box to SANE
1.0.13 - same delay in in starting the scan (+2 min. @ 600 DPI).. I
think tried it on a slightly more powerful CPU and had the same
result. This is leaning me towards that the 2.6 kernel with its
implemenation of LIBUSB works a lot better - I am going to give SuSE
9.1 a shot in a little and see if results are coincide with MANDRAKE
can anyone confirm that LIBUSB implementation would create this type of result?
On Wed, 6 Oct 2004 18:26:14 -0400, Brian K. White <email@example.com> wrote:
> > It's only at about 10 or 15% progress after 20 minutes so I'll send
> still cranking away
> just over 50%
> Now I wish I'd used the time command so I can see just how long this will
> take even if I go out to eat and it finishes while I'm gone. Then we could
> look at the total data and total time and see if it transferred at full usb
> 1.1 speed. Seems like it should be able to go a lot faster than this with 12
> megabit available.
> Brian K. White -- firstname.lastname@example.org -- http://www.aljex.com/bkw/
> filePro BBx Linux SCO Prosper/FACTS AutoCAD #callahans Satriani
> sane-devel mailing list: email@example.com
> Unsubscribe: Send mail with subject "unsubscribe your_password"
> to firstname.lastname@example.org