[sane-devel] infrared, SANE_FRAME_RGBA
azummo-lists at towertech.it
Thu Dec 14 21:29:31 CET 2006
On Thu, 14 Dec 2006 15:18:41 -0500 (EST)
"m. allan noah" <anoah at pfeiffer.edu> wrote:
> >> I'd like to hear/read some more opinions on that.
> >> Any?
> i would vote for re-openning the discussion of SANE2, and begin a project
> to port a limited number of backends forward. use a whole new SONAME, such
> that sane1 and 2 libs can co-exist for awhile. many backends will never be
> ported to sane2, because the scanners have not been made in 10+ years, and
> there is no-one to do it.
I agree, but propose to re-open only after a number of developers
a really interested in writing code.
> 4. inconsistent option names and arguments between backends.
> 5. inconsistent gamma/brightness/contrast implementations (sanei_gamma
> i have been playing with here)
> 8. inconsistent debug levels. not that big of a deal i guess. i would
> rather that they were a bitmask instead of a linear progression.
those 3 items are quite important imho.
Tower Technologies - Turin, Italy
More information about the sane-devel