[sane-devel] LSB DDK: Support for scanner drivers/SANE into LSB 3.2?
Till Kamppeter
till.kamppeter at gmail.com
Thu Jun 21 22:16:11 UTC 2007
Hi,
one important point which prevented from packaging HP's HPLIP was that
it contains a SANE driver for the scanners in HP's multi-function
devices and SANE is neither in the LSB nor in the LSB DDK. Also other
printer manufacturers, like Epson or Brother could run into this problem.
I succeeded now to build SANE (sane-backends) with dynamically linked
drivers in the LSB 3.1 Build Environment chroot. This SANE version does
not work with parallel port scanners (some standard hardware IO
functions needed by libieee1284 not in LSB) and it is not able to ask
the user for a password ("getpass()" not in the LSB), but it provides
the full SANE API for building scanner drivers.
To test whether scanner drivers built with this SANE version will work
in real distros I have simply replaced some drivers of my normal system
(Ubuntu Gutsy) by drivers from my LSB SANE package and they work also
under Gutsy's SANE. Note also that Gutsy comes with SANE 1.0.18 and my
package is a subversion snapshot of SANE near 1.0.19.
So everything seems SANE now to make distribution-independent packages
of scanner drivers. And this will not only help for being able to
include the scanner drivers for multi-function devices in the
distribution-independent printer driver packages, it will also allow the
creation of distribution-independent driver packages for stand-alone
scanners and so we expand the LSB DDK also to scanners.
Therefore I suggest also to take SANE into the LSB 3.2. SANE comes with
every distro, and its ABI (including the dynamic linking of the drivers)
is really stable (SANE 1.0.x series). Manufacturers like for example
Brother (I am not sure, perhaps Samsung too) provide binary-only SANE
drivers which easily plug into all current distros. SANE in the LSB
would also allow LSB applications to have access to scanners. Apps like
OpenOffice.org could be LSB-packaged with full functionality then.
SANE developers, WDYT about SANE getting into the LSB? Are you willing
to provide API documentation and testing procedures?
Till
More information about the sane-devel
mailing list