[sane-devel] [lsb-discuss] LSB DDK: Support for scanner drivers/SANE into LSB3.2?
till.kamppeter at gmail.com
Fri Jun 22 09:48:55 UTC 2007
Wichmann, Mats D wrote:
> Just comments on this piece, not on the bigger question of whether
> SANE support should be added to LSB and when (when mostly depends
> on who has time to do the work).
I have already asked on the SANE mailing list whether the SANE
developers would provide documentation and testing scripts, but did not
get an answer yet.
> Hardware specifics were always considered outside the scope of
> LSB as it was purely focused on defining a target for user-level
> applications. With the new focus on "hardware" in the form of
> printers and perhaps now scanners we may need to think a bit
> about that.
The LSB DDK is generally intended to allow hardware manufacturers to
supply drivers in a distribution-independent way and so to make it
easier for them to support Linux. It covers only user-space drivers, not
kernel modules. Having the printing and scanning infrastructure in the
LSB is also important for user-level applications, as they can have
printing and scanning functionality then (most common user applications
have printing functionality, and many also scanner access, like
OpenOffice.org or the GIMP).
> getpass has been explained as one of those "don't use this"
> interfaces as the password is stored in clear text in the
> process's address space. The glibc documentation contains
> one alternative implementation. It should be possible to
> have password prompting without using getpass specifically.
So we should file bugs against CUPS and SANE that they use this unsecure
function and should replace it?
More information about the sane-devel