[sane-devel] SANE2, what do we want ?
Julien BLACHE
jb at jblache.org
Fri Mar 28 21:49:44 UTC 2008
Till Kamppeter <till.kamppeter at gmail.com> wrote:
> ago and no one answered). This will help us that it is much easier for
> scanner manufacturers to ship drivers with their scanners. They can
This is all but a good thing. Currently, binary backends provided by
the manufacturers are nothing more than a total annoyance.
They're crappy, non-debuggable, under-documented, badly written, badly
tested, and available for Linux/i386 only.
Encouraging binary backends undermines the efforts done by backends
developers over the past years to obtain specification/documentation
from the manufacturers.
Think twice, please. You're actually actively harming both SANE and
the users by doing so.
JB.
--
Julien BLACHE <http://www.jblache.org>
<jb at jblache.org> GPG KeyID 0xF5D65169
More information about the sane-devel
mailing list