[sane-devel] Question on scanimage -f

[m. allan noah]

it would seem that a better long-term choice would be to correct
scanimage to output a \n after each scanner?

allan

On 5/25/08, Dieter Jurzitza <dieter.jurzitza at t-online.de> wrote:
> Dear Abel, dear Listmembers,
>  thanks very much, this did the trick! I would never have thought about doing
>  it this way, though ;-)
>
> Take care
>
>
>
>  Dieter Jurzitza
>
>
>  --
>  -----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                                |
>                                 \
>                  /\_/\           |
>                 | ~x~ |/-----\   /
>                  \   /-       \_/
>   ^^__   _        /  _  ____   /
>   <°°__ \- \_/     |  |/    |  |
>   ||  ||         _| _|    _| _|
>
>  if you really want to see the pictures above - use some font
>  with constant spacing like courier! :-)
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------Am Sonntag, 25. Mai
>  2008 02:00:23 schrieb abel deuring:
>
> > On 23.05.2008 20:45, Dieter Jurzitza wrote:
>  > > Dear listmembers,
>  > > having two scanners attached to my system I get calling scanimage -L
>
> **********
>
> > Simply write something like
>  >
>  > scanimage -f "%i %d
>  > "
>
> *********
>
>
>  --
>  sane-devel mailing list: sane-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org
>  http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel
>  Unsubscribe: Send mail with subject "unsubscribe your_password"
>              to sane-devel-request at lists.alioth.debian.org
>


-- 
"The truth is an offense, but not a sin"