[sane-devel] Canon MX 725 network problems

[HelpHelp]

Thank you Rolf and Louis,

problems solved!

Regards,


On 25.08.2014 18:09, Rolf Bensch wrote:
> Now with files ;-)
>
> Am 25.08.2014 um 18:07 schrieb Rolf Bensch:
>> However, it seems that your scanner needs more time for calibration now.
>> Patch1 doubles wait time.
>>
>> If this won't help, we need to accept a new ready flag (command 'da20'
>> normally is waiting for 0x01 in byte 8 of the response; now we also try
>> to accept 0x02). For this I prepared patch2.
>>
>> If both patches won't help, you can reopen bug #314787. It's much easier
>> to exchange log files via the bug tracker.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Rolf
>>
>>
>>
>> Am 23.08.2014 um 15:04 schrieb HelpHelp:
>>> Hello Luis,
>>>
>>> this Problem occurred with xsane too.
>>> The last logs I have put in the email, were made with xsane.
>>>
>>> Is that enough? Or do you need it with scanimage?
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> On 23.08.2014 15:02, Louis Lagendijk wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 2014-08-22 at 22:59 +0200, HelpHelp wrote:
>>>>> Hello Louis,
>>>>>
>>>>> your were absolutely right. I tried it out with usb, and there it is
>>>>> the
>>>>> same. So it might be a problem
>>>>> with the pixma driver in general.
>>>>> Should I open a new bug report, or could we solve the problem here?
>>>>>
>>>>> you can find the logs here
>>>>>
>>>>> sane-usb:
>>>>> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/12003240/logs/sane-usb.log
>>>>> sane-lan:
>>>>> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/12003240/logs/sane.network.log
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you!
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>> I had a look at the previous trace again. I wonder whether this is a
>>>> backend problem or an issue with gscan2pdf. Can you reproduce the
>>>> problem with scanimage?
>>>>
>>>> The reason I suspect gscan2pdf is that the exceptions it throws suggest
>>>> that it may not yet be setup properly before you start a scan. Can you
>>>> please test with scanimage?
>>>> Maybe Rolf can have a look at the traces as well
>>>> Thanks
>>>> Louis
>>>>
>>>>
>>>