[sane-devel] Canon MX 725 network problems

[Rolf Bensch]

What patch solved your problem?

If you needed patch2, please send me an usb log file. Many thanks.

Cheers,
Rolf


Am 26.08.2014 um 15:14 schrieb HelpHelp:
> Thank you Rolf and Louis,
> 
> problems solved!
> 
> Regards,
> 
> 
> On 25.08.2014 18:09, Rolf Bensch wrote:
>> Now with files ;-)
>>
>> Am 25.08.2014 um 18:07 schrieb Rolf Bensch:
>>> However, it seems that your scanner needs more time for calibration now.
>>> Patch1 doubles wait time.
>>>
>>> If this won't help, we need to accept a new ready flag (command 'da20'
>>> normally is waiting for 0x01 in byte 8 of the response; now we also try
>>> to accept 0x02). For this I prepared patch2.
>>>
>>> If both patches won't help, you can reopen bug #314787. It's much easier
>>> to exchange log files via the bug tracker.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Rolf
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 23.08.2014 um 15:04 schrieb HelpHelp:
>>>> Hello Luis,
>>>>
>>>> this Problem occurred with xsane too.
>>>> The last logs I have put in the email, were made with xsane.
>>>>
>>>> Is that enough? Or do you need it with scanimage?
>>>> Regards
>>>>
>>>> On 23.08.2014 15:02, Louis Lagendijk wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, 2014-08-22 at 22:59 +0200, HelpHelp wrote:
>>>>>> Hello Louis,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> your were absolutely right. I tried it out with usb, and there it is
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> same. So it might be a problem
>>>>>> with the pixma driver in general.
>>>>>> Should I open a new bug report, or could we solve the problem here?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> you can find the logs here
>>>>>>
>>>>>> sane-usb:
>>>>>> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/12003240/logs/sane-usb.log
>>>>>> sane-lan:
>>>>>> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/12003240/logs/sane.network.log
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>> I had a look at the previous trace again. I wonder whether this is a
>>>>> backend problem or an issue with gscan2pdf. Can you reproduce the
>>>>> problem with scanimage?
>>>>>
>>>>> The reason I suspect gscan2pdf is that the exceptions it throws
>>>>> suggest
>>>>> that it may not yet be setup properly before you start a scan. Can you
>>>>> please test with scanimage?
>>>>> Maybe Rolf can have a look at the traces as well
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>> Louis
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
> 
>