[sane-devel] scanimage / tesseract interoperability

[Olaf Meeuwissen]

Jeff Breidenbach writes:

> Are these two patches on track for inclusion?
> What more can I do to help?

> names-to-stdout-1.2.diff.gz
> happy-batch-1.0.diff.gz

I don't have commit privileges but both look mostly good to me.

Re: names-to-stdout-1.2.diff.gz, you have

  @@ -2283,19 +2291,27 @@ List of available devices:", prog_name);
              {
                fprintf (stderr, "%s: sane_start: %s\n",
                         prog_name, sane_strstatus (status));
  -             fclose (stdout);
  -             break;
  +             if (ofp)
  +               {
  +                 fclose (ofp);
  +                 ofp = NULL;
  +                 break;
  +               }
              }

but shouldn't that break statement stay out of the if-branch?  Looks to
me like your code has the potential to change program flow.

Re: happy-batch-1.0.diff.gz, why

  n >= batch_start_at + batch_increment

and not just

  n > batch_start_at

Hope this helps,
-- 
Olaf Meeuwissen, LPIC-2           FLOSS Engineer -- AVASYS CORPORATION
FSF Associate Member #1962               Help support software freedom
                 http://www.fsf.org/jf?referrer=1962