[Showme-devel] Fwd: ShowMeBox Kick-off
Jonas Smedegaard
dr at jones.dk
Sat Aug 29 19:22:43 UTC 2015
Hi Ritesj (and others),
[dropping all but Kris from cc]
Quoting Ritesh Raj Sarraf (2015-08-29 18:51:41)
> On Thu, 2015-08-27 at 11:22 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> First alternative I would like to explore is CubieTruck - as that
>> should be well supported by Debian Installer. We might want to
>> explore more alternatives, however, to be better prepared for
>> surprises in features (e.g. inability to work in heated/dusty
>> environments or with battery or just having bootup quirks rendering
>> it unsuitable for non-hw -tinkers).
>
> I don't own this board, but have read up a bit on its support on
> Debian.
>
> It is a powerful box (2 GiB RAM) but most vendors that sell it, also
> market a cooling Heat Sink. So I guess it does generate enough heat to
> melt the pins.
Heat is a real issue, but I don't think heat sink recommendation in
itself is reason for disqualification. What I use as weak indicator is
if boards ship with or is recommended to be used with fan, and stronger
indicator is boards explicitly documented as "industrial grade".
> And I don't think that all the components in this device are free.
The _components_ are not free in _any_ computer device - I guess you
mean that the board is not Open Source Hardware¹.
We should IMO treat this as a Debian project - i.e. set the bar at the
Debian Free Software Guidelines, with OSHW certification being an
optional bonus.
Fortunately, I managed (since above was posted) to run Beaker on an
armhf board and found that memory requirement is well below 1GB, so
there should be enough options even OSHW-certified to choose from.
I suggest we set these constraints:
* Must work with official Debian system (including kernel)
* Must have 450MB system ram (excluding gpu needs)
* Must not require fan or other moving parts
* Must have a casing (possibly open at the sides)
* Should work with official Debian bootloader (uboot)
* Should have 800MB system ram (excluding gpu needs)
* Should have a closed casing
* Should provide HDMI output
* Should cost less than $100
* May include battery for 3 hours without external power
* May cost less than $100 incl. battery, storage and casing
* May be OSHW-certified
* May support armhf instructions (not only slower armel)
What do others think about those constraints?
Here are some boards, prioritized roughly by above, with reasons for
lower "scores" in paranthesis:
* OLinuXino A20 LIME2
* OLinuXino A20 LIME (less memory)
* OLinuXino A10 LIME (less memory, single-core)
* pcDuino 3S (no battery, maybe non-Debian uboot)
* ODROID C1+ (no battery, non-OSHW)
* CuBox i2 (no battery, non-OSHW)
* Cubieboard3/Cubietruck (no battery, expensive, non-OSHW)
* Cubieboard2 (less memory, no battery, non-OSHW)
* Raspberry Pi 2b (non-OSHW, slow components)
* Raspberry Pi 1b+ (less memory, non-OSHW, not armhf)
Anyone knows other boards matching at least the must's?
¹ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open-source_hardware
--
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
[x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/showme-devel/attachments/20150829/0da335d4/attachment.sig>
More information about the Showme-devel
mailing list