[Soc-coordination] Deciding on our applications
Anthony Towns
aj at azure.humbug.org.au
Tue Mar 27 18:45:53 CET 2007
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 03:03:55PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> So, how to proceed?
> I suggest:
> 1. Mentors identify all the projects that match up with their own
> suggestions (e.g. I'll take all the various CD-tester apps) and
> identify them here on the list as ready for review
As a first pass (after removing some dupes), I came up with the following
categories: (one x per application, one line per topic)
1. cd tester (16 applications) xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
2. security (15 applications) xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
3. website (13 applications) xxxxxxxxxxxxx
4. piuparts, u/g testing (7 applications) xxxxxxx
5. emdebian/embedded (5 applications) xxxxx
6. user2user communication (5 applications) xxxxx
7. livecd (4 applications) xxxx
8. debbugs (4 applications) xxxx
9. openid (3 applications) xxx
10. apt-checkpoint (3 applications) xxx
11. biometric auth (3 applications) xxx
12. kernel config (3 applications) xxx
13. mirroring (3 applications) xxx
14. cdd toolkit (2 applications) xx
15. i18n/l10n (2 applications) xx
16. x
17. misc (3 applications) x
18. x
My guess would be we'll probably have a guaranteed slot for each of the
top four (CDs, security, website, u/g testing), and the others spots
we get to fight for :) We've got around 18 unique topics; last year we
ended up with 10 slots, iirc.
I found the CSV that's downloadable from the "Edit Organization Profile"
page helpful, but I guess only admins can download that. Do we have any
way to share stuff just between mentors?
Cheers,
aj
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 155 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/soc-coordination/attachments/20070328/78a1335d/attachment.pgp
More information about the Soc-coordination
mailing list