[tryton-debian] Bug#783029: Bug#783029: [py3porters-devel] Packaging of suds-jurko

[Paul Tagliamonte]

On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 6:21 AM, Lionel Elie Mamane <lionel at mamane.lu> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 11:46:01AM +0200, Mathias Behrle wrote:
>> * Lionel Elie Mamane: " Re: [tryton-debian] Bug#783029: [py3porters-devel]
>>   Packaging of suds-jurko" (Tue, 28 Apr 2015 16:32:23 +0200):
>>> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 03:27:12PM +0200, Mathias Behrle wrote:
>>>> * Lionel Elie Mamane: " [tryton-debian] suds in Debian" (Tue, 28 Apr 2015
>>>>   13:24:25 +0200):
>
>>>>> I just uploaded the jurko fork of suds (the latter you are maintainer
>>>>> of in Debian) to Debian.
>
>>>> I am quite surprised to hear that. Your package even doesn't seem to
>>>> close an ITP bug. Could you please provide the link to your
>>>> packaging sources?
>
>>> https://people.debian.org/~lmamane/suds/
>
>> You don't have permission to access /~lmamane/suds/suds-jurko_0.6-2.dsc on this
>> server.
>
> Fixed.
>
>>>> Sorry, coordinating before uploading to NEW would have been much more
>>>> appropriate, (...).
>
>>>> Before commenting further I would like to hear about your motivations:
>
>>> My motivation is purely having a working suds for Python3 so that I
>>> can use stdnum.eu.vat.check_vies in Python3 (see
>>> https://bugs.debian.org/774948 ). If my work is useful to others,
>>> then I'm happy to share it, if not I'll keep it is a local package
>>> for me.
>
>>> Since you seem to have good not-too-long-term plans, I'm happy if we
>>> ask ftpmaster to reject my upload to make way for your plans.
>
>> The current state is:
>
>> - pysimplesoap[0] seems to be a promising and maintained project.
>
>> I think - provided pysimplesoap qualifies as a replacement for suds
>
> It seems to present a different API, though?
>
>> (...) I ask you indeed to wait with your package (i.e. to ask
>> ftp-masters to not consider it for the moment).
>
> I just asked them to reject it.

Reject preformed.

<3
  Paul

>
> --
> Lionel



-- 
:wq