[Tux4kids-tuxtype-dev] [Tuxmath-devel] Response from school staff regarding progress tracking

[Jesus Mager]

2009/12/1 Caroline Ford <caroline.ford.work at googlemail.com>:
> 2009/12/1 Jesus Mager <fongog at gmail.com>
>>
>> > Beyond that, there is a ton of stuff from GSoC that needs to be
>> > finished or integrated into tuxtype and tuxmath.  The Qt4-based
>> > tux4kids-admin tool is still in limbo - a lot of work has been done,
>> > but there's no documentation or license info, no simple "make install"
>> > target, and no way to make tarball packages.  Also, a lot of work has
>> > been done to factor out the common code in tuxmath and tuxtype into a
>> > t4k-common library, but that still isn't packagable.
>> >
>>
>> Hi David!
>>
>> These last months I really was busy with school, but my vacations will
>> begin next week. So I will have enough time to finish the
>> tux4kids-admin. The issue of the license is one thing that we should
>> solve first. I never noticed this, no mention about license :( My
>> Fault! I will write Michael to ask him about the used license. (What
>> about a unique license for all tux4kids code?)
>
> Unique licenses are a bad thing. We are under the GPL - a stand alone
> program _could_ be BSD I suppose but we really don't want a special tux4kids
> free software licence.
>
> Caroline

So, can we supose that the code written by Michal is GPL? Or we need a
spesific autorization to that? And what version of GPL? As far as I
know, in TuxMath 95% is GPL 2, but my code is actualy under GPL 3.
Should I use also 2?


-- 
Jesus Mager
[www.h1n1-al.blogspot.com]