[Babel-users] babelctl?

[Dave Taht]

On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 8:14 AM, Antoine Beaupré <anarcat at anarcat.ath.cx> wrote:
> On 2012-08-31, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:

>>> Second, the fields display is inconsistent. The "chan (255)" field, for
>>> example, is sometimes there, sometimes not...
>>
>> The format is extensible, and in principle all fields are optional.

I note that json is easy to parse and generate, and that openwrt uses it
internally now for many things (has shell and c libs for it)



-- 
Dave Täht
http://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/cerowrt/wiki - "3.3.8-17 is out
with fq_codel!"