[Babel-users] Dave's wishlist [was: Source-specific routing merged]
Juliusz Chroboczek
jch at pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr
Tue Mar 17 11:45:02 UTC 2015
> 1) Did the issue with procd ever get resolved? (sighup I think it was)
Gabriel, Steven? Can procd be configured not to send SIGHUP, or shall
I add an option to babeld to ignore it? (Currently babeld terminates on
SIGHUP, and I like it that way, since it prevents a babeld from sticking
around after you log off.)
> 2) got the new vars into openwrt, or shall I do?
Gabriel?
> ecn
No, since I don't understand why you think that setting ECN on Babel
packets makes sense. (It might make sense to set ECN on some Babel
packets -- the ones that are marked as "urgent" -- but I'm interested in
hearing your reasoning.)
> atomic route updates
Ausgeschlossen. Last time I tried, I got a number of complaints that it
broke operational networks.
It's also less important than it used to be, since the hysteresis
algorithm in 1.5.0 dramatically reduced the number of route switches --
current versions of Babel should not be loosing a measurable number of
packets due to non-atomic switches.
> IPV6_SUBTREES autodetection
That should definitely be a runtime option. Matthieu?
Not so sure about autodetection, Steven, Henning, do you have any ideas?
-- Juliusz
More information about the Babel-users
mailing list