[Debian-zh-dev] Bug#791043: gemanx-gtk2: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default

Simon McVittie smcv at debian.org
Mon Aug 10 10:19:34 UTC 2015


On Fri, 03 Jul 2015 at 13:10:01 +0000, Matthias Klose wrote:
>  - If there are no reverse dependencies, it should be the package
>    maintainers decision if a transition is needed.  However this might
>    break software which is not in the Debian archive, and built
>    against these packages.

Looks as though there are no reverse dependencies:

smcv at coccia:~$ dak rm -R -n gemanx-gtk2
Will remove the following packages from unstable:

gemanx-gtk2 |  0.1.0.3-2 | source, amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x
libgemanx-core0 |  0.1.0.3-2 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x

Maintainer: Debian Chinese Team <chinese-developers at lists.alioth.debian.org>

------------------- Reason -------------------

----------------------------------------------

Checking reverse dependencies...
No dependency problem found.



More information about the Chinese-developers mailing list