[Debian-zh-dev] Bug#791043: gemanx-gtk2: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default
Simon McVittie
smcv at debian.org
Mon Aug 10 10:19:34 UTC 2015
On Fri, 03 Jul 2015 at 13:10:01 +0000, Matthias Klose wrote:
> - If there are no reverse dependencies, it should be the package
> maintainers decision if a transition is needed. However this might
> break software which is not in the Debian archive, and built
> against these packages.
Looks as though there are no reverse dependencies:
smcv at coccia:~$ dak rm -R -n gemanx-gtk2
Will remove the following packages from unstable:
gemanx-gtk2 | 0.1.0.3-2 | source, amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x
libgemanx-core0 | 0.1.0.3-2 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x
Maintainer: Debian Chinese Team <chinese-developers at lists.alioth.debian.org>
------------------- Reason -------------------
----------------------------------------------
Checking reverse dependencies...
No dependency problem found.
More information about the Chinese-developers
mailing list