[Debian-med-packaging] Comments regarding vsearch_1.0.7+dfsg-1_amd64.changes
andreas at fam-tille.de
Sat Jan 31 22:34:26 UTC 2015
On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 10:24:25PM +0000, Tim Booth wrote:
> Hi Thorsten,
> There is some incomplete description in README.md. All the files aside
> from simm are from public repositories and as they are all natural DNA
> sequences I don't think they can be copyrighted and therefore do not
> have a license associated.
> In more detail -
> Rfam = http://rfam.xfam.org/
> BioMarKs = http://www.biomarks.eu/
> PR2 = http://ssu-rrna.org/
> AF091148 = from EMBL-Bank
> simm = ?not sure - looks like simulated randomised data, presumably
> generated by the authors for testing.
> Note that these are not needed for the software to function but are
> useful for testing.
Just reading again what I wrote in README.source:
The files and their origin are described in data/README.md
I remember that I was hoping that this is "sufficient" documentation
(compared what we are doing in some R packages). If we should add the
information given by Tim above to this file I'd happily do so.
Thanks for your fast-processing of our sprint results. python-screed
would be also a nice thing to have as precondition for some further
Kind regards from Saint Malo
> On Sat, Jan 31, 2015, at 06:36 PM, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
> > Hi Andreas,
> > I didn't find any licenses for the data files. Do you have any link where
> > I can find more information?
> > Thanks!
> > Thorsten
> > _______________________________________________
> > Debian-med-packaging mailing list
> > Debian-med-packaging at lists.alioth.debian.org
> > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-med-packaging
> Of course I'm a technophobe; I program computers for a living!
> Debian-med-packaging mailing list
> Debian-med-packaging at lists.alioth.debian.org
More information about the Debian-med-packaging