[Debian-med-packaging] gdcm_2.6.0+dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

[Andreas Tille]

Hi Gert,

On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 04:08:18PM +0100, Gert Wollny wrote:
> 
> While I notes that there are indeed two instances that are quite
> differently worded so that it makes sense to me to rename the short
> license, there are also five instance of the BSD-3-clause license that
> only differ because they use formatting (bullet points versus numbered
> list)

IMHO these should be unified and mentioned in a separate

   License: BSD-3-clause

paragraph.

> and because some of them list author/company names in license
> point (3) instead of the generic term "copyright holders" that is
> suggested in [1], which means that IMHO they are all valid BSD-3-clause
> licenses.
> 
> What would be your suggestion to deal with these cases? Making the
> names unique be setting the short names to "BSD-3-clause/wxWidgets",
> "BSD-3-clause/gdcmuuid", ...?

Not sure about this - may be if the text is *really* different.

Kind regards

       Andreas.

-- 
http://fam-tille.de