[Debian-med-packaging] gdcm_2.6.0+dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

[Gert Wollny]

On Tue, 2015-11-17 at 16:20 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:

> > and because some of them list author/company names in license
> > point (3) instead of the generic term "copyright holders" that is
> > suggested in [1], which means that IMHO they are all valid BSD-3
> > -clause
> > licenses.
> > 
> > What would be your suggestion to deal with these cases? Making the
> > names unique be setting the short names to "BSD-3
> > -clause/wxWidgets",
> > "BSD-3-clause/gdcmuuid", ...?
> 
> Not sure about this - may be if the text is *really* different.

The texts are like this: 
--
* Neither name of Mathieu Malaterre, or CREATIS, nor the names of any
  contributors (CNRS, INSERM, UCB, Universite Lyon I), may be used to
  endorse or promote products derived from this software without   
  specific prior written permission.
--
* Neither the name of my employer, nor the names of its contributors 
  may be used to endorse or promote products derived from this software
  without specific prior written permission.
--
3.The name of the author may not be used to endorse or promote
  products derived from this software without specific prior
  written permission.
--

Which means, they all say the same, but while changing a numbered list to bullet points is no big deal, I'm reluctant to change these original texts that appear in the source code.


Best, 
Gert