[Debian-med-packaging] gdcm_2.6.0+dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

[Andreas Tille]

On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 04:40:28PM +0100, Gert Wollny wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-11-17 at 16:20 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> 
> > > and because some of them list author/company names in license
> > > point (3) instead of the generic term "copyright holders" that is
> > > suggested in [1], which means that IMHO they are all valid BSD-3
> > > -clause
> > > licenses.
> > > 
> > > What would be your suggestion to deal with these cases? Making the
> > > names unique be setting the short names to "BSD-3
> > > -clause/wxWidgets",
> > > "BSD-3-clause/gdcmuuid", ...?
> > 
> > Not sure about this - may be if the text is *really* different.
> 
> The texts are like this: 
> --
> * Neither name of Mathieu Malaterre, or CREATIS, nor the names of any

Mathieu in CC - he once maintained the package and might be able to
clarify this ...

>   contributors (CNRS, INSERM, UCB, Universite Lyon I), may be used to
>   endorse or promote products derived from this software without   
>   specific prior written permission.
> --
> * Neither the name of my employer, nor the names of its contributors 
>   may be used to endorse or promote products derived from this software
>   without specific prior written permission.
> --
> 3.The name of the author may not be used to endorse or promote
>   products derived from this software without specific prior
>   written permission.
> --
> 
> Which means, they all say the same, but while changing a numbered list to bullet points is no big deal, I'm reluctant to change these original texts that appear in the source code.

Kind regards

      Andreas. 

-- 
http://fam-tille.de