[Freedombox-discuss] prosody vs ejabberd
yellowbounder at gmail.com
Wed Sep 28 22:41:53 UTC 2011
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 10:28 PM, k. <kloschi at subsignal.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-09-28 at 15:17 -0600, Bdale Garbee wrote:
> > I could use input from people who have *actually used* prosody and/or
> > ejabberd about your experiences and the resulting pros and cons of the
> > two daemons.
> I am using prosody since > 2yrs.
> * It works very stable,
> * is written in Lua (good for embedded systems and probably the language
> of choice for another handful of things too).
> * even if it might lack needed features we need, the developer is very
> approachable and the community there in general *very* helpful
> (exceptional even for FLOSS standards imho)
> * e.g. buddycloud  floss based federated social web works with it
> preferred (tho they support ejabberd as well)
> * it comes with a debian repo from the developer
> * prosody has numerous very stable core modules plus alot of
> testing/beta modules which in general are very stable as well
> just my 5 cents.
> I am using prosody for my own personal XMPP server right now, it's good to
setup, and supports mostly anything you'd need out of an XMPP server,
including XMPP components.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Freedombox-discuss