[Fsf-Debian] [Dev] Comparison with Parabola

[Bryan Baldwin]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 08/05/2012 04:55 PM, Clint Adams wrote:
> I would love to do that, irrespective of what the FSF is willing
> to list or not list.

Thanks, Clint. This is the attitude that I expected to find coming
here to talk about collaboration. No one has to care what the FSF
thinks in order to care about freedom. Right now, I think I can trust
FSF to care about my freedom, but there is something a bit more noble
then that about people like yourself who care about freedom for the
sake of its own merit. I know there are a lot of Debian developers and
maintainers who feel the same way, too.

Karl called me out about that in my thread. He's right that a lot of
my discussion is very critical of Debian. But he would also be right
in saying that my criticism is more or less directed at a subset of
it, rather than the whole. Nonetheless it is a very dubious subset
begging for more then a little critical examination.

> However, the attempt to do this in 2004 failed decisively, and I
> fear that it would fail even harder now that we are all aware of
> the evils of firmware.  Additionally, I am under the impression
> that the indoctrination process (NM) trains people to tell these
> blatant lies to which you seem to object.

I described such people in another mailing list post as "lazy and
impressionable technologists trying to be trendy."
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQHicpAAoJEM5s7GXJ0FEIxHYH/3zcvt3UOyZhjI/WW3gftmAC
Ztq/z3nPjhBJvtNUHyZlfs/mYXvk3NahWmLpPyML2l0/Z8eZ1cdQKf2ea82t+Rl3
52HReI0AhpXxP5tw6TyzkJSIl6OOzE/5ydNXAkueQ9pTyBGiytcFa9o65Lia7zKw
Fs8tOUA8xGUPnZ7+ciyldpmf+dXc+jeVfw3gZD9buQ+67ssrKZC/fg/q5dNZp4pL
Kq/bDeoxyyMeisy/LcMtu1wxFcK75HOw3pYn8KJLDABAlGWI8+PyfYIcglX52wZI
ZD4RnafBK8o8SX3371cCJLb7F5ztLo7f4TEwsl1MpC8Fbft2ftBwbIPNT5YShtM=
=oVIs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----