[Nut-upsdev] Re: [Nemo-devel] nuts status page

[Kjell Claesson]

Follow up,

The code is submitted to the svn trunk. You may test it if
you like.

Regards
Kjell

tor 2006-08-03 klockan 22:47 +0200 skrev Kjell Claesson:
> tor 2006-08-03 klockan 15:00 -0500 skrev Paul Armor:
> > Hi Kjell,
> > 
> 
> Hi Paul,
> > We're using the bcmxcp driver.
> > 
> > Thanks!
> > Paul
> > 
> 
> I have checked up the packages. The nut-2.0.3 does not support this in
> the cgi that make up the page.
> And it did not get into the last release nut-2.0.4.
> 
> But it is in the subversion trunk. I can change the bcmxcp driver
> to support this values. This have been on the 'todo' list for
> me for some time. But my time on this have been limited.
> 
> The changes that have to be done is the image var table in upsimage.c
> in the cgi client and also extending the bcmxcp_meter_map in the driver.
> 
> The first is done, so i can extend the driver. The problem is that you 
> need to use the svn code. And that may be a problem if it is a 
> production setup.
> 
> But i get to it asap, then you can decide if you want to try it out.
> 
> Regards
> Kjell
> 
> 
> > 
> > 
> > On Thu, 3 Aug 2006, Kjell Claesson wrote:
> > 
> > > Hi Bruce,
> > > tor 2006-08-03 klockan 11:59 -0500 skrev Bruce Allen:
> > >> Adam: Thanks for putting up this page.  But something is wrong.  In
> > >> particular, our Powerware 9135 is a three phase UPS system with THREE 480
> > >> volt outputs.  So the displayed voltage is not correct -- in fact there
> > >> should really be THREE voltages displayed, all around 480v.
> > >>
> > >> Nut developers: I am copying the NUT mailing list to see if anyone can
> > >> suggest how to fix this.  NUT developers, see the following page to see
> > >> the problem: http://nemo.phys.uwm.edu/cgi-bin/upsstats.cgi .  Instead of
> > >> displaying a single voltage of 276 VAC we should see three voltages of
> > >> around 480 VAC.
> > >>
> > >> Cheers,
> > >>  	Bruce
> > >
> > > Yes this can be fixed.
> > >
> > > Are you using the bcmxcp driver or is it monitored by snmp?
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > Kjell
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Nemo-devel mailing list
> > > Nemo-devel at gravity.phys.uwm.edu
> > > http://gravity.phys.uwm.edu/mailman/listinfo/nemo-devel
> > >
> > 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Nut-upsdev mailing list
> Nut-upsdev at lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsdev